A modern vision of Culture will require national law.

There is a fair expectation with respect who the next Minister of Culture and as an urgent cultural policy will be implemented.

As I pointed out on other occasions, the Culture was little considered in the speech aspiring President of the Republic. : However, who Asuma Conduction of esta portfolio management Debera Start with guidelines Claras, I wish you ARE being drawn with realism and broad criteria and that this sea of ​​the hand of a member of the government team work.

After six years of existence, the Ministry of Culture is much work to do sea park A promoter ministry and not only Controller. While it is true that there is significant activity in the National Grand Theater, it remains true that there is UN Efficient sector seems Keeping The Vision of an action that focuses on what Archaeological fundamental and wave Important although limitations perspective from the place of this ministry should be required by Peru and needed by our rich and varied culture, especially as we approach the bicentennial of our independence.

A modern vision of Culture, to turn it into a lever for development and axis identity, require the internal UN system, a fin that a healthy evaluation allows you to call a the most capable and show that it can and should generate jobs, investment , Good Governance and, therefore, Capacities New, innovative interventions, and an image of Peru that is associated with the Contemporary cultural creation, without doubt, is based both in the millennial on proposals Current. I think the sin rector of the UN and action plan clear and orderly, without obtaining it will be possible Indispensable financial resources to Culture, already seated at the table of decision policy, Stop be seen as the Cinderella or As UN sector "Second".

One of the immediate to be taken by the new administration actions would be to develop a "road map", understood as part of the comprehensive state action, let us understand that you have a clear idea of ​​culture as the core of identity and belonging and how agent of change, modernity and progress. I know from experience that this statement can be difficult to implement, but we must remember that this ministry was, in its origins, a proposed organization, functions and guidelines was developed with the support of AECID and the participation of all the sectors involved: artists, actors, managers, etc.

While it was necessary to join the ministry entities that were outside the sector, such as the National Library and the General Archive of the Nation, this was joined responsibilities that should be implemented by other government entities, such as the implementation of the law consultation previous. As a government action seems very important, but do not think it's one of the capacities of the Ministry of Culture nor its primary responsibility.

There is hope that the proposal of the president-elect, referring met, inter alia, to increase the budget for the sector and boosting what remains a dream: to encourage the participation of employers and individuals through tax incentives culture. Fields such as fine arts, music, literature, theater and national and regional troupes require the inclusion of younger generations to cultivate creators who have access to competitive funds, have incentives and motivation.

While it has been said that whoever takes this portfolio should be not only a person with knowledge of governance, but with the capacity to carry out a plan of culture that is built solid and technically government action, so that proposals supportable and be consistent, as this sector cuts across government action and performs throughout the entire national territory.